Why It’s Possible Women May Advance Like Never Before Under a Trump Administration

  NOTE: What follows was originally written in the run-up to Inauguration Day and prior to the Women’s Marches.  The sheer numbers of men, women, children, queer, transgender that participated — worldwide — spoke for themselves. What we didn’t know at the time was how this galvanizing moment ultimately set the stage for an even bigger, more profound movement that is taking shape in real time. The impetus behind the marches — the fight for survival — is now magnified to global scale and hopefully will translate into a similar, powerful and peaceful cooperation.  x The difference now, though, is that what was originally about survival is now also about character and conviction. Women led the way with a strong voice and strong numbers. Now it’s up to everyone, including Republicans and Republican lawmakers to raise their voices, be counted and resist. If we don’t, we’re complicit and ‘Never Again’ will be robbed of its passion and meaning.  x Since Election Day,  I (like so many other women) have been living in a state of almost paralyzing denial, fear and dread, despairing that — with the stroke of a pen —  so much that’s been hard-fought-for and won will be obliterated. x But on Inauguration Day, the anticipation stopped, the new world order was ushered in and we all became players in a four-year reality media event writ large. January 20, 2017 changed the surreal to the real and we had a choice to make. We could keep wringing our hands or we can recognize the moment for what it is: a true inflection point in the struggle for...
Through the Leaders’ Lens: Corporations Need to Cultivate Soft Skills, Not Simply Hire for Them

Through the Leaders’ Lens: Corporations Need to Cultivate Soft Skills, Not Simply Hire for Them

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal offered compelling research that affirmed employers’ increasing demand for “soft skills” in today’s workplace, including — but not limited to — communication, organization and punctuality. x Their official findings? x “In a Wall Street Journal survey of nearly 900 executives last year, 92% said soft skills were equally important or more important than technical skills.” x But…and this is a big but… ’89% said they have a very or somewhat difficult time finding people with the requisite attributes. Many say it’s a problem spanning age groups and experience levels.’ x As a leadership consultant for many organizations and leaders across  industries, this was, to me, old news, as I’ve been banging this drum, addressing and teaching/coaching/ preaching on this need for years. x The article, while curiously geared towards job seekers  (just listing the skills on a resume doesn’t make it so) rather than employers, offers too pat a  prescription for the long term health of an organization: glibly declaring that employers (finally ) see the value of these ‘soft’ skills and that applicants should now accommodate just by listing them on a resume does not equate to culture-changing or culture building initiatives. x Why? Because the approach is thin and, presupposing that these new hires actually have  the desired skills, it couldn’t possibly scale fast enough.  Perhaps clever tips for getting hired  but insufficient for equipping an entire organization with the skills proven to be critical to creating a culture of innovation and productivity.   Bottom line: forward-facing leaders can’t afford to passively hope these skills will defy gravity and trickle up.  Instead, creating a lasting culture that places value on critical soft skills requires deliberate, consistent cultivation (through coaching and coordinated initiatives), mindful modeling...
Through the Leaders’ Lens:  Closing the Pay Gap

Through the Leaders’ Lens: Closing the Pay Gap

It was recently reported that 28 high-profile companies have signed a White House pledge to tackle pay inequity within their own organizations. A mere twenty-eight out of how many American companies have pledged to address the pay inequity going on under their noses for decades… or more? While I’m happier to have the pledge from these companies than not,  all the backslapping, self-congratulations and victory dances strike me as ridiculous, bordering on offensive.  To begin with, the pay gap — or let’s call it by it’s rightful name, pay discrimination —is such old news that companies that have yet to rectify it by 2016 should be publicly scorned, not celebrated. And the fact that the Department of Labor — despite having the progressive-ish Carter, Clinton and Obama in the White House since the 1970s — is only now getting around to ‘updating’ its sex discrimination guidelines for the first time since then, only further begs the question:  where has everyone been and what have they (not) been thinking??? And oh, by the way, in the post-gender era, why aren’t we broadening the conversation for an ‘all gender solution?’ While there’s much that should have and could have been done already, the onus here is not just on our elected officials, including Boards of public companies or C-suite executives.  Instead — and to keep it simple for those leaders slow to catch on – let’s keep this binary for the moment — we women also have to bear some responsibility. It’s nice that the Federal Government is allocating $50m to both  teaching community college students to negotiate for better starting wages and to improving the portrayal of women in the media, etc.    Sadly, this will create a slow institutional turn,  at best....
Through the Leaders’ Lens:  Turning a Come-On Into a Contact

Through the Leaders’ Lens: Turning a Come-On Into a Contact

In a recent column in the New York Times, the author respond to a woman who was “hit on” while in line at a coffee shop and advises her regarding how she may turn this “come on” into a career-enhancing contact.  While I acknowledge the Workologist’s optimism and more importantly, his humanism, his efforts are naive, tone deaf and grossly irresponsible, likely harming this woman’s career rather than promoting it.  ‘Anonymous’ depicts a fairly common scenario encountered by women in business and while it’s harder to handle as a young career woman, it continues through the years regardless of age or seniority.  In many cases, though, overtures like the one made by the ‘older man’ are less a function of age or seniority and much more a function of power. In my opinion as  an executive coach who works with professional women up and down the pipeline and as a woman who has encountered such overtures both at the beginning of my career and in real time, I unequivocally say that this young woman should NOT — under any circumstances — pursue any kind of relationship with this man. Forget about a platonic relationship’s being, as the Workologist suggests, a ‘long shot;’ there is no platonic relationship worth pursuing here as his premise was not that:  trying to transform social advances into professional advantage is simply a non-starter and a terrible idea. This is sexual politics and the power relationship was established at the get-go, with this man leveraging his age and presumed influence to ‘come on’ to this woman. In reality she wants something from this man which automatically keeps her at...
Through the Leaders’ Lens: The Problem with Mass Market Advice

Through the Leaders’ Lens: The Problem with Mass Market Advice

For the last several year, The Leaders’ Lens — dtkResources’ curated and annotated roundup of current leadership  articles and salient news items —  has been sent exclusively to my executive clients.  Designed to contextualize volumes of content, The Leaders’ Lens effectively cut through the clutter by providing executive leaders with the critical perspective they so needed to access more nuanced and strategic  thinking. Based on its success, we’re now filling a huge need by offering The Leaders’ Lens articles — providing pushback, depth, and applicable takeaways —  for an expanded audience that’s more accustomed to consuming mass marketing advice peddled by amateurs.  Most well-meaning, but amateurs nonetheless.  Instead, we’re addressing this often misguided and occasionally irresponsible advice presented by otherwise discerning editors — by posting this exclusive material on my own website as well as on various news outlets in a comment or in the form of letter to the editor. My reasoning? At its best, mass market advice: Is elementary and simplistic, addressing the widest — and commercially advantageous — audience possible, with little applicability on an individual level; Is remarkably unnuanced, ignoring the complexities of the challenges currently facing  American business and its workforce; Is so homogenized that it  lacks guts and grit.  Written (or filmed) generically for the broadest demographic, it isn’t capable of speaking specifically to the real needs of individual employees, companies and industries; At its worst, this generic advice — prescribed for the masses — risks inflicting outright harm to individual careers.    So, how can an evolved and evolving professional make any use of the mass market material as they try to grow and develop themselves and their  organizations? To help, I’ve decided to begin publishing...
Deep-Sixing the Traditional Performance Review 

Deep-Sixing the Traditional Performance Review 

While being ahead of the curve can be a lonely place   (so many are content to tolerate the status quo, even when it’s clearly stale)   I’m used to it!   My thinking, my perspective and my proprietary programs can be disruptive, challenging prevailing assumptions and up-ending convention. But happily, with time, some early adopters — those rare evolved leaders who understand that success involves both innovation and a resistance to conformity —catch on and help normalize the new. This is an exact sweet spot for dtkResources, as it’s here where we can create change and generate impact. x Take, for example, the ritual of annual performance reviews which are universally loathed (by the rater and the recipient!) and often feared. The current wisdom finally understands the negative impact and collateral damage this  process can cause. And so, there’s (again – finally!), a movement afoot started by a growing number of Fortune 500’s to ditch the process, especially the part that has to do with numerical rankings.  In contrast, affection is growing for the more qualitative aspects of the formal review but as long as the review remains ‘formal’ and annual (or even semi-annual),  its impact and value will always be limited. x Over two years ago,  when I first unveiled my answer to this huge problem with my proprietary “Dynamic Intel,”  firms were still invested in the formal, quantitative review process.  360s were also on the scene but were most often deployed on a one-off basis and in response to a particular disconnect or dysfunction. It’s hard to uproot the status quo and at the time, Dynamic...