The Two- Gender Solution

The Two- Gender Solution

2015 Update:  After reading this article below, take a peak at my updated article, “The ALL Gender Solution,” which you can find here.  I refuse to allow the dtkunplugged digital presence to digress into a place of complaints absent solution, so I won’t go into how long I’ve been creating a blended leadership model to serve us well as we face the global realities of the 21st Century. However, it was in early 2013 when I started to hear my words return poignant echoes, with significant reach. And it has been gratifying to see the conversation finally getting out of the “yes, but” phase and into this “yes, and” phase, where progress can be made. While some may still be stuck in very old thinking and argue to the contrary, men and women are different. We have different wiring and different innate strengths, but the blending of the best of each will can only create something that’s better than the sum of the parts. This blended leadership model — which is an important part of what I call the Two-Gender Solution — has always been my objective in the work I do both individually and corporately. It’s what I believe will ultimately generate the best results all around. This new, men/women inclusive conversation is critical and it requires an inclusive vision from the top, especially in male-dominated industries and sectors. But, while engaging/recruiting evolved men in power is certainly key to initiating change, change will continue to be slow… Unless… We rightfully have trained a lot of attention on how we can better socialize our daughters to prepare them...
Finally:  A Demand for the 10,000 Foot View

Finally: A Demand for the 10,000 Foot View

For my entire career, I have known that one of the most critical values I offer organizations is being able to marry the 10,000 foot, future-facing view with a boots on the ground approach.  In a business world that works quarter to quarter, the larger, more contextual view is often lost, and with it — an organization’s ability to plan deliberately, work lean and succeed in the short and long term. So, I was relieved when I read Elaine Varelas’ article in Chief Learning Officer on June 3, 2013.  She titled the article “How to Keep the Next Generation of Leaders“ and while I encourage you to read it at your leisure, her most applicable point — simplified — was the need for leaders who take a long-term view. I agree that this 10,000 foot view is critical for retaining talent, but it is equally critical for navigating change, shifting a culture, and maintaining (or building) profitability. I’ve included a snippet of my original comment to the author below, and would love your thoughts.  What do you think businesses miss when they lead and manage by the quarter vs. taking this long-term approach? “We live in a time where the only thing that’s certain is uncertainty. Evolved leaders must know how to maintain and communicate vision and also be agile (and hubris-less) enough to course correct in real time, all while creating an engaged workforce.”–...

Name of the Game: Independent Day

Everywhere you turned this past week, there was some article or another discussing the significance of and reverence for July 4. And rightly so, as it’s been said that the collaborative work product of our Founding Fathers formed the basis of a most compelling political system. Plus, it’s an inclusive celebration — definitely not a contrived Hallmark event — shared by all Americans. So, we again celebrated our war for independence which largely was about our mission as a new country to differentiate ourselves from the thinking and systems of Britain. While technically “rebels,” the Founding Fathers were not impetuous, anarchic or undisciplined in arriving at a decision and then acting: they were thinkers, and deep thinkers at that, reading, writing, discussing and debating until they were ready to do the real work of nation building. They studied all forms of government, sourcing the Ancients as well as the Enlightenment philosophers, to get their best understanding of the tensions between individual freedoms and protection of the collective good. Those particular tensions still exist in the political conversation but interestingly, they’re now coming to bear in the world of business. Same tensions but much different context: again citing Daniel Pink, we’ve progressed from the Knowledge Age to the Conceptual Age. At one time, not long ago, knowledge was proclaimed king and was the difference between business (and individual career) success and, well, the opposite. So much of that capital has since been automated or outsourced and open-sourced that it is no longer a determining factor: having knowledge is a given, the price of admission. Now it’s more about how we...
ROI: Return on Internship

ROI: Return on Internship

Over the last few years, organizations have increasingly relied on college summer internships to help fill the new hire pipeline: 80 percent of companies surveyed by the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) said that recruiting for full time hires was the primary purpose of companies’ internship programs. Summer internships aren’t new, but it’s only recently that they’ve taken on the full magnitude of what amounts to a summer-long job interview. Clearly, this works for companies, as it provides a cost-effective opportunity to kick the tires before purchasing, but it also provides a tremendous opportunity for the interns themselves to demonstrate value and convert their summer positions into full time job offers. But the anecdotal and empirical evidence suggest that summer interns are not maximizing the opportunity. For example, in a recent survey (Emily Bennington, Seriously Empowered Leadership) of more than 700 executives, approximately 75 percent believe that the recent crop of college interns and grads aren’t “cutting it.” In fact, of the 68 percent of respondents who work with or hire new grads, only 26 percent felt those grads were prepared for the rigors and requirements of the 21st Century workplace. While these aspiring professionals may emerge from college with some subject matter intelligence, they’re not arriving with a mastery, let alone understanding, of the critical skills needed to secure the job, demonstrate value…and then succeed. In some cases, companies — to see return on their summer investment — offer training to help interns enhance their performance and start taking ownership of their careers. With that said, make no mistake: this is not a one-way transaction. Instead,...
Ladies Take Your Seats

Ladies Take Your Seats

One of the most common refrains I hear from my clients who are professional and executive women is that they aren’t being offered the proverbial “seat at the table.” In some cases, this is meant metaphorically and alludes to their wanting to be heard. Often, though, it’s meant quite literally, as they grouse about not being invited to meetings or other events they deem substantively or politically significant. This, they feel, is a huge roadblock to their being taken seriously, recognized for their contribution or given a try at the brass ring. That this is still an issue is remarkable, really, when you consider that women enter so many professions at parity with men and actually graduate college in greater numbers. Couple that with women’s enormous purchasing power, our core strengths now deemed critical for success in the 21st century and the demonstrated benefit companies derive from women’s serving on corporate boards. It’s astounding that we’re still waiting to be asked. The result: we occupy only 17 percent of the positions at the top. Seventeen percent, across industries and even in Congress. So, what’s happening? Women are either not putting themselves in the mix or are bailing, that’s what. For some, it’s to do the noble work of raising a family. Some go back, some don’t — their choice. But for many others, bailing represents a real and ready escape, just at the point in their careers when they should persevere. I know. I bailed. But why? After awhile, the frustration of not getting the seat, and more to the point, of not dealing with what’s really in the...